Ethiopian History 101 in Brief
Through
out history; people have migrated and expanded seeking greener
pastures and more land. Globally, most countries have endured and
were created thru expansions, wars, assimilation, migration; slavery
etc. Even the most developed countries in the world today have dark
pasts. For example; millions of Native Americans were exterminated or
removed from their homelands while millions more African-Americans
underwent the most cruel slavery in world history before the great
democracy; the USA; was born. If not for the gradual improvement of
human rights in America and its military superiority triggering an
economic powerhouse; United States would have been just another poor
country facing fragmentation and internal division due to its dark
history of conquest and slavery. While Ethiopia did not have as much
a bloody history as America; it did experience some conflicts and
small level of slavery. Considering how extremely diverse Ethiopia is
ethnically, linguistically, politically and religiously, Ethiopia
still has been a relatively peaceful country. And that has been one
reason why, despite all its problems, its citizens are proud. Case in
point: how many poor countries with over ninety native languages and
a near 50/50 Islam/Christian population have managed to co-exist or
live in relative peace for over thousand years? Not many. But still,
Ethiopia has had its share of problems as well. As an Oromo; the two
most violent and most important events that impacted my people are
the Oromo expansion in the 1500s and the Shewan Menelik expansion of
the 1880s. These two events represent the two stages of Ethiopia’s
ethnolinguistic evolution.
Stage
one: Oromo expansion
After
the 1540s; the ethnolinguistic and political shape of the horn of
Africa changed forever when the Oromo expanded north into territories
dominated by the Amharic speaking people of Abyssinia/Ethiopia as
well as the Sidama and the Adal kingdoms. Historians credit our
unique Gadaa system for being suitable for warfare and for the
successful conquest of present day central; west and eastern Ethiopia
by the Oromo. According to Oromo oral accounts and historical
records; the Oromo expansion into Abyssinia was disorganized but
Oromo raids and attacks of the neighboring people lasted for many
decades; leading to the killing of tens of thousands of Amharic
speaking people. The powerful Oromo benefitted from its large
population and better developed battle strategy. The Oromo expansions
were also similar to that of the Ottoman Empire expansion because
they both did not always change the religion of their new subjects.
With the only exception of the Yejju Oromo imposing Afan Oromo on
Amharas in Gondar; the Oromos also never enforced their language on
other people. Nonetheless; many Somali, Amharic and Sidama speaking
peoples became “tax-paying serfs” for the new Oromo rulers. And
having already been weakened by the Adal/Somali conquest of southern
Abyssinia; the Amharic & Tigrayan speaking population of
Abyssinia lost more lands to the Oromo; including the Shawa and
Dawaro regions (Arsi area) that have been Abyssinian territories
since the days of their ancient Aksum empire. Today; the descendants
of these Oromo settlers makeup the dominant population in Shewa and
Arsi. Not only the eastern and southern edges of the Abyssinian
highlands but; gradually; even some northern pockets of Abyssinia got
conquered by Oromo warlords: which explains why small Oromo
communities can still be found as far north as Tigray even today.
Thus; in the late 1500s; having lost substantial territories to the
Oromo; the Solomonic Dynasty/Abyssinia declined in power for decades.
But that century also started the transformation of Abyssinia into a
more multi-ethnic entity: one that was forced to incorporate Oromo as
one of its citizens.
Stage
Two: Menelik/Shewan expansion
Both
of these historical events of the 1500s and the 1800s shaped the
ethnolinguistic identity of the new Ethiopia.
Conclusion
The
most glaring difference between the two events is that one happened
in a recent memory and thus it influences the current politics of the
region more powerfully. Otherwise; both events are dark and equally
violent parts of our history. De-emphasizing or ignoring one event
over the other only creates confusion and bitterness among the new
generation. An Oromo should not ignore “stage one” and only talk
about “stage two.” Similarly; an Amhara should not ignore “stage
two” and only talk about “stage one.” The blame game by
bringing a biased version of the past only poisons the present. No
one side should play the victim game or live in the past, instead of
working for a better future; otherwise everyone will fall together.
References
-US
Library of Congress Country study: Ethiopia history
-
Pankhurst; Richard K.P. The Ethiopian Borderlands: Essays in Regional
History from Ancient Times to the End of the 18th Century. The Red
Sea Press; Asmara.
-
Oromo Oral history
No comments:
Post a Comment