Dawit Giorgis
is a Visiting Fellow at the Foundation for Defense of Democracies and
a former senior official in the Government of Ethiopia and David Andrew
Weinberg is a Senior Fellow at the Foundation penned the following commentary on The National Interest's website last November following the violence against Ethiopian migrant workers by Saudi's Police and its vigilantes who took the law in to their hands.
Last month,
three
Ethiopians were killed in the Saudi capital of Riyadh, as well as
one
foreign worker from Sudan. They died amid
vigilante
violence
and reports of
police
brutality after illegal immigrants in the slum of Manfouha
protested against a massive campaign of deportations that the
government launched this month. A
similar
demonstration was broken up in the city of Jeddah, and its
organizers arrested.
Meanwhile, large
groups of Ethiopians have been gathering for protests this week at
Saudi diplomatic institutions across the United States, including in
front of the Saudi Embassy in
Washington,
as well as the Kingdom’s consulates in
Atlanta,
Los
Angeles and in many parts of the world.
What is this big
controversy about?
Saudi officials
claim that the Ethiopians
instigated this episode by throwing stones at cars without any provocation, but a reporter for the Wall Street Journal talked to locals who had a different view. They said “Saudi security forces had come to the neighborhood the night before to declare that all illegal African migrants had to leave… immediately. Pakistani laborers began trying to help police by catching African workers, and clashes began”.
instigated this episode by throwing stones at cars without any provocation, but a reporter for the Wall Street Journal talked to locals who had a different view. They said “Saudi security forces had come to the neighborhood the night before to declare that all illegal African migrants had to leave… immediately. Pakistani laborers began trying to help police by catching African workers, and clashes began”.
This harsh
crackdown comes as part of a longstanding Saudi effort aimed at
increasing the proportion of citizens employed in productive sectors
of the economy. However, it is also the result of a pervasive legacy
of racism and religious discrimination experienced by African
Christians in the Kingdom.
Saudi
Arabia only abolished slavery in 1962, under heavy pressure by
Washington and the UN. The best estimates suggest that the Kingdom
held approximately thirty thousand slaves at the time.
But the Wahhabi
religious establishment was reluctant to see the institution go. Just
a decade ago, a member of Saudi Arabia’s highest religious body was
caught on tape
preaching that “slavery is a part of Islam”. He elaborated
that “slavery is a part of jihad, and jihad will remain as long as
there is Islam”.
In this
insidious mindset—which, of course, is rejected by many Muslims—a
hierarchy of races could be seen as a religious obligation. Due to
what Saudi dissident Ali al-Ahmed calls a “culture of slavery”
that “pervades the country,” even dark-skinned men and women who
are Saudi citizens have been
blocked
from positions in a range of prestigious professions.
There are an
estimated nine million foreign workers in Saudi Arabia, mostly doing
jobs that Saudis themselves do not want to take. And so far, the
sudden crackdown is mainly just causing disruptions to Saudi Arabia’s
national economy. According to a story in
the
Saudi
Gazette, twenty
thousand schools in the country are now short of janitors, and 40
percent of small construction firms have stopped operations. One
observer even counted thirteen facilities for the religious ritual of
washing dead bodies that had been shuttered in Jeddah because the
workers responsible for this thankless task had been forced to flee.
Many illegal
immigrants have wanted to go home but were unable to do so. Hundreds
of Filipinos have been camping out in front of their country’s
consulate in Jeddah because they needed official support to get exit
visas and purchase expensive airplane tickets home.
Saudi Arabia’s
kefala
labor system
facilitates
human rights abuses, “sometimes amounting to slavery-like
conditions.” The system gives companies enormous power over their
foreign employees, including the ability to block employees from
flying home if they are unhappy with their work conditions. That is
why such rights groups and theEconomist
have called on
Riyadh to abolish the kefala
system.
Overlaid with
this system of discrimination and exploitation is Saudi Arabia’s
chauvinistic repression of Christian residents. Many African workers
in the country are Christians, but absolutely no churches are
officially allowed. As recently as this April, Saudi Arabia’s Grand
Mufti
declared
that all churches in the Arabian Peninsula must be destroyed.
In
February, Saudi Arabia’s religious police
raided
a private religious gathering of fifty-three Ethiopian Christians,
shutting down their prayer group and making mass arrests. Just half a
year earlier, authorities deported thirty-five others for
participating in a similar Ethiopian prayer group. And in 1997 two
foreign workers were
beheaded
for conducting Bible study meetings and prayer groups in prison.
But no aspect of
these abuses is more chilling than the examples of bodily harm
experienced by some foreign workers in the Kingdom. Many of the
individuals returning to Ethiopia have scars or fresh wounds
from
beatings by employers or police, and one man claims the officer
who beat him
even
stole the shoes from off of his feet. According to the
UAE
paper Emirates
24/7, “scores of
Asian and African domestic workers
have been reported to have
committed a suicide in Saudi Arabia over the past years because of
mistreatment and other factors”. Chilling
images keep
surfacing on the web of Ethiopian maids who were so desperate with
their circumstances in Saudi Arabia that they hanged themselves.
Over
the years,
numerous
videos
have
surfaced
showing
angry, entitled Saudis beating and verbally abusing foreign
workers—although to their credit,
many
Saudi citizens called out for a criminal investigation in one
recent case. A
study
by the Committee on Filipinos Overseas found that 70 percent of
Filipino domestic workers in Saudi Arabia reported instances of
physical or psychological abuse.
Ethiopia’s
ambassador to Riyadh, who obviously wishes to maintain good relations
with his Saudi hosts, actually
claimed that
twenty-three thousand of his countrymen “handed themselves in”
after Manfouha. They are being
deported
in large numbers at this very moment.
How bad must it
become for economic migrants when suddenly tens of thousands of them
are allegedly begging for a way out? And at what point does the
international community have a responsibility to say loudly and
emphatically enough is enough?
No comments:
Post a Comment